Anatomy as a tool to understand the causes of seed failure: a study of crosses Eucalyptus species

Genaina Aparecida de Souza; Karine Fernandes Caiafa; Gleison Augusto dos Santos; Karoliny do Carmo Gandra; Carla Aparecida de Oliveira Castro; Igor Barcellos Pantuza; Josimar dos Santos Ladeira

doi:10.53661/1806-9088202549263877

Authors

Genaina Aparecida de Souza Epamig Sudeste, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0547-3451
Karine Fernandes Caiafa Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0788-0405
Gleison Augusto dos Santos Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0773-810X
Karoliny do Carmo Gandra Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciencia Florestal, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6015-0999
Carla Aparecida de Oliveira Castro South Carolina Forestry Commission, Tillman, South Carolina, United States https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-8765
Igor Barcellos Pantuza Bracell Florestal, Lencois Paulistas, São Paulo, Brasil https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9178-0775
Josimar dos Santos Ladeira Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fitotecnia, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1384-0143

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53661/1806-9088202549263877

Keywords:

Seed viability, Anatomical analysis, Controlled crosses

Abstract

Seminal propagation of eucalypt plays a crucial role in breeding programs, serving internal consumption and commercial applications. This study aimed to develop a method for examining anatomical changes in seeds obtained from Eucalyptus crosses to elucidate the causes of seed viability loss and low seed production observed in certain mating pairs. Flower buds/fruits were collected from four different genetic materials (E. grandis, E. urophylla, E. urophylla × E. grandis, and self- pollinated E. urophylla). Crosses classified as good or poor seed producers were sampled at 15-day intervals from anthesis to maturity. After collection, samples were fixed in FAA₅₀ solution (1:1:18 v/v formaldehyde, acetic acid, and 50% ethanol) and stored in 70% ethanol. Subsequently, the samples were subjected to six different preparation methods, involving standard procedures, combinations of high and/or low temperatures, seed softening substances, and vacuum treatment. Flower buds producing unformed seeds exhibited a functional ovary with reduced locules and increased lignification. Aditionally, unformed seeds were covered by thick integuments and displayed abnormal endosperm cells. In cases where the developing ovary was visible, highly lignified tissues with numerous sclereids were observed. By contrast, flower buds with lower lignification had ovaries with well-developed locules, containing seeds with a normal appearance, characterized by a single-layered integument and well-delimited nucleated endosperm cells. Also, self-pollinated materials produced a few seeds, some of which were unformed. Thus, we conclude that anatomical alterations, likely influenced by genetic factors, lead to incompatibility, resulting in limited seed production or the production of unformed seeds in certain Eucalyptus crosses.

Keywords: Seed viability; Anatomical analysis; Controlled crosses